Hail to Obama-the next Caesar

After Obama's world tour and seeing the thousands of Germans watching him, it brought back the images of Hitler speaking to the masses and the adoring unwavering support he received from those masses who were willing to die and give up their children to his cause. The agenda of Obaama appears not to be the U.S. Presidency, but the new world leader (did someone say antichrist?). He claimed to be a citizen of the world and talked of breaking down not just lagnguage and cultural barriers, but also the borders that separate nations. How can he possibly accomplish this feat? Well, first you become the leader of the most powerful country in the world (the U.S. still is at this time). Then you have to have support from other major countries (Germany with it's German ingenuity, Japan with its technological superiority, France-all of these totally endorse Obama), support from other countries with strong military or terrorist ties to aid you in the world take over (Iraq's minister endorsed Obama during his trip, Pakistan supports him and Pakistani nationals have monetarily supportd him, other Mid-East countries support him including Syria), support from terrorists (Hamas, PLO, South American terrorist groups have given his campaign money, Osama bin Laden, New Black Panther Party, and he has a terrorist on his campaign panel that tried to blow up the Capitol), the press (the media both foreign and domestic are saying very little against him and he is being broadcast worldwide) and money (Obama has raised the most money of any candidate in history). Also, if you want to take over the world, what better place to start than with the people of the country that almost succeeded twice in the last century-Germany. The Germans were susceptible to the fiery speeches of Hitler and appear not to have learned as they are supporting Obama as the new Messiah to lead them.

My recommendation to all Americans (and all the people of the world) is BEWARE! When the world cares more about who we elect as president than we Americans do, something is wrong-terribly wrong. Here in the U.S. he has kept his agenda close to the vest. No one knows exactly who he is or what he stands for. He changes his stance depending on the moment--what he stood for in his campaign against Hillary he now opposes and he seems to be trying agree with everything McCain says so that the people will choose the "better tongue." We have been warned before to watch out for these false messiahs and we need to be paying strict attention now or we will be damned for all time.

Pfleger fails as a priest

By now everyone knows about Fr. Michael Pfleger of St. Sabina's parish in Chicago and his rant against Hillary at the infamous Trinity United Church of Christ (Rev. Jeremiah Wright's previous employer), but that is not the reason he fails as priest and should be excommunicated from the Catholic Church. It has to do with his support, both verbally and financially, to those who support abortion including Rev Al Sharpton and Barack Obama. Yes, he has given money in the past (at least $1200) to Obama's campaigns in return for state and federal tax money for his programs. The issue of abortion is supposed to be strictly upheld, even to the point of denying politicians communion for their support of abortion (on 16 Feb 2005 Cardinal Francis Arinze, the top Vatican official in charge of sacraments declared that no pro-abortion politician may partake in Holy Communion). Yet, here is a priest who has given money to a man who supports abortion at any stage of pregnancy--even partial birth abortions, and he is allowed to remain a priest. His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI should immediately step in and remove Fr. Pfegler as a priest and excommunicate him from the Church regardless of what else he may have done either for or against people. This is one stand the Catholic Church should make and should make it now. They need to let all Catholics around the world know that their resolve on this issue is unwavering. This is not a political issue, but a moral issue. And now I here Obama is courting the Catholic vote. How can a devout Catholic vote for a man who supports abortion unequivocally? There are are issues about life and death in the Catholic Church that are not so clear, such as the death penalty, wars, etc., but this issue is defined emphatically because of the destruction of an innocent life.

We'll see how the Church responds or if they are so enamored by Obama and his supporters such as Fr. Pfleger that they will turn the other way.

Are you smarter than Obama?

Instead of "Are you smarter than a 5th grader?" let's play the new game, "Are you smarter than Obama?" The questions are taken from actual words spoken by Mr. Obama over the last few months. Let's see how well you do...

Question 1: How many states are in the United States of America?
a. 48
b. 50
c. 58

Answer: b. 50. However, Mr. Obama thinks there are 58 states when he said that he was now campaigning in his 57th state with 1 to go.

Question 2: Which state is closer to Kentucky?
a. Arkansas
b. Illinois
c. both

Answer: b. Illinois--Mr. Obama said Arkansas (he says that the reason Hillary won Kentucky is because she is from Arkansas which is closer to Kentucky. Actually, his home state of Illinois touches Kentucky whereas the closest Arkansas comes is touching the states of Missouri and Tennessee)

Question 3: The bloody civil rights march in Selma, Alabama occurred before Obama was born or after he was born? Hint: He was born in 1961

Answer: After--Mr.Obama said that it occurred before he was born in 1961 (it actually occurred in 1965) and that it was the reason he was born.

Question 4: True or false? A small country like Iran, even if possessing nuclear weapons, poses no threat to the U.S.

Answer: False-Iran is one of the biggest terrorist states in the world and is currently responsible for most of the casualties to U.S. servicemen in Iraq. Obama says it is too tiny to pose any threat.

Question 5: The predominant language spoken in Afghanistan is:
a. Arabic
b. English
c. None of the above

Answer: c. None of the above. However, Mr Obama, who is chairman of the Senate Committee on European Affairs which includes oversight of Afghanistan, declares that we need to take some of our Arabic translators out of Iraq and put them in Afghanistan so that we might better help the troops there. They won't help if no one speaks Arabic.

Question 6: True or False. "Fallen heroes" refers to members of the audience at Barack Obama's Memorial Day speech.

Answer: False--but Obama said that he saw many of them in the audience that day. I'm sorry, but dead is dead.

Question 7: How many were killed in the tornadoes that hit Kansas in May 2007?
a.10,000
b. 12
c.6 billion

Answer: b.12--Mt Obama said that 10,000 died. I have never heard of tornadoes killing 10,000 people anywhere.

Question 8: When addressing people in Sioux Falls, SD you should say "Thank you...

a. Sioux Falls
b. Sioux City
c. Soup of the day

Answer: a. Sioux Falls--a politician should never address a town as being another town in another state (Obama said, "Thank you Sioux City" which of course is in Iowa).

If you got 1 of the questions right, you are smarter than Obama, and yet he is the one who will most likely be the next President of The United States and he does not even know basic U.S. geography or basic foreign affairs. Scary isn't it?????

Obama: Blowing Off Or Blowing It

Obama has made his campaign rhetoric resound with "bringing people together" and working "for all people", yet he has decided to "blow off" the blue collar white workers totally. Is this working to help all people, or only those special interest groups he can sway with his forked tongue? He says that in the general election, he can win the Presidency without those states. Can he? Time will tell. If he does win the the general election by carrying 90% of the black vote and less than 25% of the blue collar white worker vote, will that bring the country together, or will that further divide it? Once he is President and starts working more to help the blacks in this country at the expense of the white middle class, will that bring the country together? He is saying by his actions that only certain people matter and he will choose who those people are and reward them at the expense of the others. His lack of campaigning in West Virginia as well as his unwillingness to debate Hillary in North Carolina shows that he is playing the same old political game that he has vowed to change. The change he talks so fervently about will be the money in his pocket and those of his chosen and will be taken out of the middle class and blue collar workers. Let's hope this politicking of old blows up in his face.

Obama-nation

In the wake of the Reverend Wright controversy I need to point out a few things. First if Obama does become president, will the U.S. the be called an Obama-nation (abomination)? It will make sense won't it-having a President who is not only new to the world political field but also one who does not even have a basic understanding of economics, world issues, or free trade and is willing to sacrifice anyone who might impart a poor perception of him or even an innocent bystander.

My second point elaborates the last statement. When Obama gave his "greatest speech on race since Lincoln or Kennedy" the first time he addressed the controversy over "the Rev", he was willing to sacrifice his dead grandmother for the man. The woman who took him in as a child, made sure he got a good education, and pointed him the right direction so that he might run for the presidency was sacrificed for a non-relative who became Obama's "golden calf"-he idolized the man (and in my opinion, he still does). He called her a racist-this woman who "raised and sacrificed" for him-and hung her out for all the world to despise. A woman who is deceased and cannot deny these claims nor defend herself. The remark struck me as a spin off of the urban legend that attributes the same type of language to the Reverend Jesse Jackson that states that he said that when he heard footsteps behind him on a dark street that he was relieved when he turned around and found it to be a group of white men as a opposed to black youths that might do him harm. Did his grandmother really say those things to him? Who knows? But if you look at the fact that when he was being raised by his grandmother in the early 1970's, it was in Hawaii-HAWAII! How many blacks were in Hawaii in the early 1970's? The U.S. census for Hawaii lists a total of 7573 blacks living in Hawaii in 1970 or about 1% of the population-on all the islands. So, how much contact and situations involving fear of blacks could there possibly have been? Not many-if any.

The next point also deals with him throwing others to the wolves. Obama originally said "I can no more disown him (Rev.Wright) than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother..." Well, we've already seen him disown his grandmother and in his latest speech here in North Carolina he has totally disowned the Rev. Does that mean now he has also disowned the black community as well? That what it sounds like doesn't it? Obama did not look or act mad when he rejected The Rev-he looked more like a puppy who just got beat by the owner he loves but will come crawling back to him when the furor subsides. He does not reject The Rev, he is hurt by him but still has the idolization and admiration in his eyes.

I tend to agree with The Rev on one very critical point-Obama is a politician who must do what a politician does to get elected and stay elected. In spite of the rhetoric that Obama spews, he IS a politician-and a deadly one at that who is willing to throw family members as well as mentors to the lions for the sake of political gain.

If he is willing to do this while running for President (and running away from debates with Hillary), what (or who) will he sacrifice when he is President? The American people.

Obama-where's the beef?

In the presence of today's primary in Pennsylvania and preceeding the one here in North Carolina on May 6, I have to turn my attention again to Obama. The Charlotte Observer (which should be renamed the Charlotte Obama-server which, by the way, refused to print my letter to the editor exposing Obama's ties to Islam) reports today that there will be no debate in NC and that it was decided by the DNC because it is too late to schedule one. All this because Obama refused to debate Hillary who had already agreed to it. After the last debate in which he was finally asked some tough questions and his answers were not golden or platinum, I don't blame him. However, if he is trying to show that hes is substance and not all talk, then he should put forth his actions and not his words in a debate. Rather, he likes to have his words scripted and handed to the people under controlled situations and not "off the cuff."

In one of my previous blogs I mentioned Obama's ad campaign here in NC (which is on the radio at this very moment!) about big oil and what he would do to fix it. I got to thinking about this, and if he really wants to show the people he can get things done, why doesn't he go back to Washinton right now and introduce a bill to do just that. The last time I looked he was still being paid by "we the people" to do a job-not to campaign. Why doesn't he do that job now and show us what he can do before gas reaches $4.00/gallon? Why? Because he can't. And if he can't get the job done as a Senator (who are supposed to introduce legislation and pass laws--not the President!), then he surely won't accomplish this as President.

So, Mr. Obama, where's the beef?

Obama still claims no muslim ties-Hah!

By now everyone knows the ill-advised sterotypical remark of Pennsylvania white workers put forth by Barack Obama at a fundraier in San Franciso, CA, but do you know at whose home those comments were made? He was at the home of Sohaib and Sara Abbasi, a Pakistani (Abbasi is a muslim family name) who made billions of dollars for the computer giant Oracle. He obtained his computer science degree from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Since the September 11 attacks, he has endowed Stanford University with $2.5 million dollars for an Islamic studies and professorship. The support includes graduate fellowships, research, new library, stronger language courses and public programs on Islam. They also tried to support computer science programs in educational (Muslim) institutions in Pakistan. Mrs. Abbasi sits on the board of Developments in Literacy that has built 200 schools in Pakistan since 1997. Their goal is not to provide an understanding of Islam by non-Muslims, but to promote Islam and its ideas.

Don't think for one moment that by them hosting and giving money to Obama that they aren't looking for any favors either for themselves, their Muslim ideologies or for their beloved Pakistan (which is harboring Osama Bin-laden). Here is your muslim background that you have strongly denounced publicly coming into play in the political arena that will affect this country and the non-Muslim countries as well, Mr. Obama!!!!